Author:
Author: Thamburu Sudhakaran
Critical Assessment and Multimodality
Hazard (2019) emphasizes that “identity, literacy, and education are socially constructed”. This means that our understanding of who we are, how we communicate, and how we learn is shaped by the society and culture we live in. For example, a student’s background—like their culture, gender, or economic status—can influence how they perceive and engage with learning materials. Literacy is not just about reading and writing alone, it also involves the understanding and use of various forms of communication, such as images, digital media, and sound.
To meet the diverse need of students, educators should consider using different teaching methods that cater to various learning styles. This could involve incorporating videos, interactive activities, or group projects to make learning more accessible and engaging for everyone. By doing so, teachers acknowledge and respect the unique perspectives and strengths each student brings to the classroom.
When it comes to assessments, moving away from traditional tests can be beneficial. Hazard (2019) suggests that assessments should mirror real-world challenges and encourage skills like teamwork and problem-solving. For example, instead of a standard exam, students might work together on a project that addresses a real issue, allowing them to apply what they’ve learned in a practical context. This approach not only makes learning more relevant but also helps students develop important skills they’ll use outside of school.
Incorporating technology and promoting collaboration in the classroom can further prepare students for the modern world. By adapting teaching methods to meet the diverse needs of students, educators can create a more inclusive and effective learning environment. As Hazard (2019) points out, such adaptations ensure that all students have the opportunity to succeed.
References
Hazard, A. (2019). Identity, literacy, and education: A framework for the 21st century. Educational Press.
Smith, J., & Lee, K. (2020). Multimodal learning in diverse classrooms. Journal of Educational Innovation, 15 (3), 45–60.
Hi Thamburu! Your explanation of the sentence of Hazard (2019) is very clear and practical, but I think it will be better if you add “which are usually shaped and determined by societies people live in” to the last sentence of the first paragraph. This may make your argument more centered. I agree with your ideas about changes needed to be made of teaching methods and assessment, which show the spirits of multimodality. However, I think the expression can mention the Multimodality more, so that the theme of the content could be more prominent. This is where I find I need to improve too. Thanks for your sharing!